Ironbridge Power Station – Converting from Coal to Biomass – our objection

E.On’s coal-fired Ironbridge Power Station will close by 2016 because it breaches European air quality rules. This should be a perfect opportunity for the UK to move away from large, dirty, inefficient and climate-wrecking power stations and towards genuinely climate-friendly and sustainable renewables, coupled with investment in energy efficiency to reduce energy use.

Instead, E.On as well as other big energy companies are looking for ways to keep their power stations open and to profit in the process: by burning biomass.

The company has not had to go through the regular planning process, by submitting an EIA. They have simply applied for permission to store wood on site so that they can burn biomass. Is it right that coal-fired power stations can simply switch to burning biomass without scrutiny? We certainly don’t think so: read our objection here

Biofuelwatch article about biomass, Ecologist

Stop the biomass blackout: Say no to destructive bioenergy policies, Ian Lander, Biofuelwatch

Open Letter against ROCs for bioliquids

Open Letter to DECC and the Scottish Government against ROCs for electricity produced from bioliquids, by ActionAid UK, Biofuelwatch, Friends of the Earth England, Wales and Northern Ireland, Friends of the Earth Scotland, Greenpeace, Sumatran Orangutan Society, War on Want and World Development Movement

Open Letter against ROCs for biomass and bioliquids

Open letter to the UK and Scottish Governments relating to the Renewables Obligation Banding Consultation

Signed by 87 organisations worldwide

 

Press Release: Committee on Climate Change would sacrifice the world’s forests on the altar of UK’s energy addiction

The Committee on Climate Change today published its long-awaited Bioenergy Strategy Review, which calls for biomass to be used on an unprecedented scale. Read our response here.

Scotland: Say No to Forth Energy’s Plans at Rosyth

Forth Energy has applied for planning permission for four large biomass power stations in Scotland: in Dundee, Grangemouth, Leith (Edinburgh) and Rosyth.

Although touted as a green energy solution, the reality is that these proposals will:

  • exacerbate deforestation
  • increase carbon emissions and thus worsen climate change
  • cause local pollution, putting communities’ health at risk
  • cost the public £300 million in subsidies
  • be so inefficient that they contradict Scottish Government and EU policy on biomass

Forth Energy’s plans have been opposed by large numbers of local residents, several Scottish NGOs and also by a number of Councillors and MSPs.

However, the ultimate decision on all four power stations will be down to Energy Minister Fergus Ewing. He could decide the Rosyth application any time now.

Please write to your MSPs today and ask them to share your concerns with Mr. Ewing and to call on the Scottish Government to reject the Rosyth application as well as the other four applications. 

Please amend/personalise the letter to have a greater impact.

And please help spread the word about this alert. Many thanks.

lookup.msps@scottish.parliament.uk
Your name and address as entered below will be added. You do not need to add your name above.
56 people have taken part in this action. Please contact alerts@biofuelwatch.org.uk if you have any difficulties or queries.

[really_simple_share]

Biofuelwatch Briefing: ‘The Reality Project’ on the Isle of Wight – Local and global threats

Biofuelwatch Briefing: ‘The Reality Project’ on the Isle of Wight – Local and global threats

Biofuelwatch briefing: Biomass power station in Blyth

A Biomass Power Station in Blyth: Local and Global Threats, Biofuelwatch briefing about a proposed 100 MW biomass power station by RES Biomass Energy.